Article Yann Moix published November 2 on the website of The Rule of the Game (RDJ), Bernard-Henri Levy (BHL):
Petition against the law Gayssot: Development
Yann Moix
As often with the petitions, you can never guess in advance who will be co-signers. I was contacted a few days ago about a petition against the law including Robert Badinter Gayssot the signatory should be featured. I was promised a Robert (Badinter) but, alas, I discovered a different Robert, ultimately, on the list: Faurisson!
Although not support this legislation which, as I explained on the site laregledujeu.org, seems unfit to fight counterfeiters and who insult the dead of the Holocaust, I will admit to any way, either today or tomorrow, that my name appears on a petition signed by Mr Faurisson or some other lesser known sires but of the same ilk.
I will never accept, neither today nor tomorrow, that my name be associated with any approach to, in any manner whatsoever, to rehabilitate or trivialize revisionism. Therefore I hereby strongly and officially, no part of the petitioners against the currently circulating Gayssot. The only relationship I have with them is their total disregard my door. Anyone or insinuate otherwise propagate from today will therefore find it disseminates misinformation, abusive, libelous - and bear the consequences.
------------------
Response Paul-Eric Blanrue:
Contrary to Yann Moix said today , Tuesday, November 2, he knew, before signing his article in The Rules of the Game , the identity of all signatories of the petition against the law and release Gayssot Vincent Reynouard I launched last August. I told him, in fact, sent by e-mail a link to the full list thereof ago nearly a week, Wednesday, October 27 at 7:33 p.m.:
Moix Thus he could quietly take the knowledge that Robert Faurisson had signed the petition - and not Robert Badinter, what a joke that he has never been " promised "as" signatory star "by anyone, just read elsewhere my blog as of October 23 to realize that Badinter, joined by me, has declined our offer of signing from October 19 .
Knowing this, Moix wrote his article against Gayssot October 28, one day after having read the complete list of signatories includes the name of Robert Faurisson . It made me pre-read his paper on the same day at 17.30, after forward to Maria, secretary of the Rules of the Game (RFD), which was published in the evening after some final corrections.
can well imagine the pressure cons Yann Moix since the publication of his article and the release of the petition. One can even understand knowing him, he was stricken by panic. And then, working under the thumb of BHL is not easy! Occasionally, cracks Moix:
 |
| Portable Blanrue Paul-Eric, to provision of expert advice, checking, sealing and subsequent criminal proceedings Yann Moix for " violation of secrecy of correspondence. " Such a small offense is nothing when it allows a gentleman to prove that lies to his remarks. |
I can not, however, tolerate that to hope to get away from his bosses, lied brazenly Moix on my account, even if it lacks the courage to mention my name. The truth is therefore to be restored, supporting documentation. We hope that the impudent liar correct his article in the light of what has been clearly demonstrated!
 |
| Yann Moix |
Paul-Eric Blanrue
PS: Mr. Bruno Roger-Petit wrote on The Post " Whatever one thinks of the Gayssot Act, and if what is said Yann Moix proved (and I do not know why, but I am 100% confident it viewed this profile of the initiator of the petition) that ; case shows that prosecutors in the law that prevents Gayssot revise round, under cover of freedom of expression, still trying to crack by any means. In this they are faithful to themselves, and there is not even need a law to prove it. When you defend a lie, we do it by lying. Logic. "A guy who
instinct, Roger Petit. Expected his apologies to him too.
PSS: THE LIE OF THE EVIDENCE PROVED Yann Moix IS ON GOOGLE AND SEEK THE MEMORY OF THE ENGINE RESEARCH. THIS IS THE WAY THAT WE REMOVED A LIAR ITS FINAL VERSION:
(I signed a petition in this sense on which are obviously , are logically , my worst enemies and garbage the more proven ).
Check for yourself here:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:LPdc_o_73y4J:laregledujeu.org/moix/2010/10/28/400/contre-la-loi- Gayssot / + ign% C3% A9 + a + p% C3% A9tition + in + the + meaning + to + that + are +% C3% A9videmment, + are + logically + my + worst + enemy + and + the + garbage + the + more +% C3% BC% C3% A9es A9r & cd = 3 & hl = en & ct = clnk & gl = en & client = firefox-a
Here's the copy:
This sentence in brackets, taken from the first version of his paper and then cut (see above article as it is spent on the site of RDJ) proves by itself that Yann Moix knew, as I have said earlier, what was the identity of some of the petitioners. He lied so crass. Caught in the act, here it is confused by a consistent body of evidence. He counts on me and the Clan of the Venetians to know! It has just begun!
Meanwhile, the petition has garnered since its official release over 100 new signatures. While some rock in the pit, others felt growing wings.
ILL
---------
Addendum: Abel and Caro, journalists World, are beginning to understand ... One wonders why they end their article by a "what to believe?" No special occasion.
ILL
http://droites-extremes.blog.lemonde.fr/2010 / 11/02/yann-moix-la-petition-et-les-negationnistes-qui-croire /
November 2, 2010
We concepts this morning. writer Yann Moix on his blog hosted by the Rules of the Game , review of Bernard-Henri Levy, published Tuesday, November 2 "focusing" in which he explains how he would have been trapped by finding next to notorious Holocaust deniers and neo-Nazi in a petition for the repeal of the law and release Gayssot Vincent Reynouard. Read our post on the subject here . From Friday, October 29, we tried to get in touch via his blog, with Mr. Moix. We have, for now, always no response.
"I was contacted a few days ago about a petition against the law including Robert Badinter Gayssot the signatory should be featured. I was promised a Robert (Badinter) but, alas, I discovered a different Robert, ultimately, on the list: Faurisson! "He writes .
The writer continues: "(...) I will admit any way (...) that my name appears on a petition signed by Mr Faurisson lords or some other lesser known but of the same ilk. I accept never (...) that my name be associated with any approach to, in any manner whatsoever, to rehabilitate or trivialize revisionism. is why I state here, firmly and officially, no part of the petitioners against the currently circulating Gayssot. The only relationship I have with them is their total disregard my door. Anyone or insinuate otherwise propagate from today will therefore find it disseminates misinformation, abusive, libelous - and bear the consequences. "
Good. The problem is that the truth seems to be different. Indeed, after verification with Google cache (memory search), a phrase originally appeared in the paper Moix explaining his opposition to the law Gayssot. However, this crucial sentence has been removed. Here it is: " I signed a petition to that effect, which are obviously are logically, my worst enemies and most proven waste " . The sentence would therefore tend to show that contrary to his assertions, Mr. Moix knew the identity of some of the signatories of this petition. What to believe?
0 comments:
Post a Comment